QMikeAI
Quantum intelligence. Complex systems.

A clearer view of
what comes next.

Investigating quantum reservoir computing, quantum machine learning and quantum-enhanced HPC for systems that change over time.

Explore the research Open the weather lab
59.91° Nφ(t + Δt)DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS / SCHEMATIC

HPQC Research Institution
A question worth testing:

How far can we learn to anticipate
a complex system?

Research in development · A QDaria programme
The wider programme

Many systems.
One scientific question.

Explore all research
01 The weather workbench

A window into the atmosphere.

Explore a question. Compare a scenario.
Follow every value back to its source.

Synthetic research-interface dataExplore the map and timeline

Illustrative data only. These are synthetic scenarios, not real forecasts, observations or QRC results.

Norwegian study region03 locations
Select an illustrative location in NorwayA simplified Norway outline. Select Oslo, Bergen or Tromsø with the map or the location selector. Values are synthetic, and contours are decorative.Oslo9.0 °CBergen9.6 °CTromsø1.6 °C
Schematic geography · illustrative contoursEPSG:4326

Eastern Norway

Oslo

59.91° N
10.75° E
Air temperature · +24 h

9.0°C

Reference scenario

A synthetic value for exploring the research interface.

Scenario comparison

°C
Air temperature at OsloTwo synthetic scenarios across 72 hours. Both series use the same location, variable and initialization. Selected lead: 24 hours. Selected value: 9.0 °C. Exact values are in the expandable data table.
Reference scenarioExperimental scenario
Forecast lead+24 hours
Initialized
01 Oct, 00:00 UTC
Issued
01 Oct, 01:00 UTC
Valid
02 Oct, 00:00 UTC
Dataset
Norway interface study · v1.0.0
Data & provenance

Illustrative locations, not verified weather stations. No forecasts, observations or QRC model runs. Values and differences demonstrate the interface only.

Source
Deterministic local fixture
Dataset ID
qmikeai-synthetic-norway-v1
Methods
Synthetic reference scenario; Synthetic experimental scenario
Geographic extent
4°–32° E, 57°–72° N · EPSG:4326
Time convention
UTC. Lead is measured from initialization. Issued time is recorded separately.
Sampling
Six-hour steps; values at 2 metres above the illustrative surface.
Read the data and research boundaries
View exact scenario values
Oslo · Air temperature (°C) · synthetic scenarios initialized 01 Oct, 00:00 UTC. Difference = experimental − reference.
LeadValid time (UTC)ReferenceExperimentalDifference
+0 h01 Oct, 00:009.409.400.00
+6 h01 Oct, 06:0011.0911.480.39
+12 h01 Oct, 12:009.189.850.67
+18 h01 Oct, 18:007.288.020.75
+24 h (selected)02 Oct, 00:008.979.580.61
+30 h02 Oct, 06:0010.6610.960.30
+36 h02 Oct, 12:008.758.65-0.10
+42 h02 Oct, 18:006.846.37-0.47
+48 h03 Oct, 00:008.547.83-0.70
+54 h03 Oct, 06:0010.239.49-0.74
+60 h03 Oct, 12:008.327.77-0.55
+66 h03 Oct, 18:006.416.20-0.21
+72 h04 Oct, 00:008.108.300.19
CONVERSATION / RESEARCH COMPANION

Make sense of the signal.

DEMO MODE
NEXT QUESTION USESOslo Air temperature +24 h
reference · °C · run-a
A clearer view of your research

From a weather signal
to a better question.

Explore the selected data, compare scenarios and sketch a validation study. Each answer keeps the context you asked about.

Deterministic local responses. Synthetic data. Proposed methods. No live weather or model inference.

Enter to send · Shift + Enter for a new line
0/2000
Ready for your question

DEMO MODE · Scripted responses, with no AI inference. Messages and selected synthetic context are sent to this site’s server. This demo has no saved conversation history. Synthetic data is not a weather forecast.

A working interface for a proposed study. The values are synthetic, the locations are illustrative, and no forecasting model has been executed.

02 The research approach

From observations to understanding.

Read the proposed methodology

A quantum reservoir is one part of a hybrid system. Its value must be tested against strong classical alternatives, with the same information, careful validation and a complete account of cost.

Architecture under investigation

Investigate whether reservoir dynamics provide useful temporal features. Distinguish simulated circuits from quantum hardware measurements. Input encoding, washout, replay, shots and measurement all contribute to cost.

03 Another question in motion

From atmosphere
to airflow.

Four of Mike’s car concepts, each with its own computational geometry and Mojo flow result. Choose a design, inspect its Gmsh mesh and replay the computed airflow. The QRC comparison remains to be run.

Explore the fluid-dynamics study
Three-dimensional flow study

Computed car airflow

Classical CPU reference

Computational counterparts of earlier car designs.

Computational counterparts of earlier designs. Each selection loads its own Gmsh mesh and computed flow.

Explore the computed airflow

Design reference above. The numerical view uses this car’s own mesh and saved flow results.

The institution / Our scientific questionResearch programme in development

HPQC Research Institution

How does uncertainty at the smallest scales relate to the unpredictability of the world we observe?

Our mission is to investigate dynamics at the Kolmogorov dissipation scale and the possible links between microscopic quantum uncertainty and macroscopic dynamics. The connection is a research question, with mechanisms and limits to establish.

Read the research mission
Classical turbulenceη=ν3ε4A continuum dissipation scale
Quantum stateσxσp≥ℏ2A bound on position and momentum spread
Different physical descriptions. These relations do not define a shared length or a universal quantum–classical crossover.

Quantum uncertainty, chaotic sensitivity and uncertainty in measurements or models describe different things. A credible study must tell them apart.

A discipline of evidence

Prediction is a question.
Advantage is something to measure.

Explore the papers Discover the mission